![]() ![]() I recognize the fact that certain lists it would have a place, though I don't play those kinds of lists. IMHO, Whirlwind Scorpious > Sicaran Arcus. I have a lot of experience with artillery and Scorpious though. I have no practical experience with the Arcus, as no one in my meta has one. If anyone wants to know, this is the Sceleratus tank originally made by Sebthies on thingiverse, but the files have since been taken down. The once, somewhat common, tank that was seen on the battlefields of 30k with the Iron Hands mainly is now another relics from a bygone age. Im thinking of reprinting mine and making the lasguns longer. but that's a pretty tall order for a tank that has to have line of sight to its target for two turns. The Sicaran-pattern main battle tank was an invention of Ferrus Manus & Roboute Guilliman's design along with help from the Mechanicus. The Arcus gets 8 shots when it doesn't move. If you specialize the tank and your opponent doesn't bring the unit you specialize for, you just wasted those points- points you could have spent on multi-melta upgrades for your Rhinos, or a P-fist on your Sergeants. ![]() If you bought all those warheads, you'd have a 270 point tank- more than a Land Raider without it's durability. The Arcus has to pay points for all those special warheads, which are nice, but they make it into a "Jack of all trades" tank. Everything it shoots is a S8 AP3 3" blast, and when it sits still, it can fire 1+d3 of those shots. It doesn't require line of sight to shoot. You can field two Whirldwind Scorpious for the price of one Arcus. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |